Monastery of Amarbayasghalant: Principles of architectural-spatial organization and stylistic features
Выпуск № 2 (41) 2026 журнала "Искусство Евразии"
PDF (Русский)
JATS XML (Русский)
PDF (Русский)
JATS XML (Русский)

Keywords

Mongolian architecture, Buddhist architecture, Amarbayasghalant, architectural-spatial organization, stylistic features, Zabadzar, Tsam ritual,

How to Cite

Borgel D., Uranchimeg D. Monastery of Amarbayasghalant: Principles of architectural-spatial organization and stylistic features // The Art of Eurasia, 2026. № 2 (41). P. 92–103. URL: https://doi.org/10.46748/ARTEURAS.2026.02.005.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...

Current Issue

Make a Submission

Abstract

The article focuses on the Amarbayasgalan Monastery, a significant yet under-researched Buddhist architectural ensemble in Mongolia. Construction of the monastery began in 1727 under the direction of Zanabazar, a prominent statesman and enlightener. The study is based on an analysis of the monastery's architectural features, topographical location, spatial planning, and decorative elements. Primary sources for the research include published data, visual materials, and archaeological findings. The paper examines the key aspects of the spatial design and structural principles that shaped the monastery's architectural concept. It is evident that the formation of these elements was influenced by a unique synthesis of diverse national artistic traditions, including Mongolian, Tibetan, and Chinese styles. This fusion resulted in a distinctive style in Mongolian architecture. The article also highlights the symbolic significance of the monastic space, particularly within the context of the Tsam religious ritual. This ritual encompasses choreography, costume design, masks, and musical accompaniment. The monastery is a significant cultural heritage site and warrants further research into the interconnection between architecture, religion, and traditional culture.

https://doi.org/10.46748/ARTEURAS.2026.02.005

References

  1. Sermier, C. (2002) Mongolia: Empire of the steppes. Hong Kong: Odyssey Books & Maps.
  2. Steinhardt, N.S. (2022) Borders of Chinese architecture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  3. Tsultem, N. (1982) The eminent Mongolian sculptor G. Zanabazar. Ulaanbaatar: State Publishing House. (In Russ.)
  4. Shishin, M.Yu. (2016) ‘Zanabazar — spiritual top of Mongolia’, Iskusstvo Evrazii = The Art of Eurasia, (1), pp. 20–28. doi:10.25712/ASTU.2518-7767.2016.01.002. (In Russ.)
  5. Syrtypova, S.-Kh.D. (2023) The Zanabazar code (1635–1723): Mongolian style and nomadic aesthetics in Vajrayana Buddhist art. Moscow: Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences. (In Russ.)
  6. Batnasangiin, S. (2008) ‘Mysterial and epic origins of the Mongolian theatre’, Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences, (69), pp. 22–25. (In Russ.)
  7. Li, Wang (2024) ‘Symbolic and allegorical images of the Tsam dance language’, Bulletin of the Vaganova Academy of Russian Ballet, (2), pp. 69–80. (In Russ.)
  8. Banzragch, Ch. and Sainkhuu, B. (2004) History of Mongolian monasteries. Ulaanbaatar: Soyombo Press. (In Mong.)
  9. Abaeva, L.L. (2014) ‘Semantics of circle and traditional worldview of the peoples of Central Asia in context of the Buddhist religious culture’, Buryat State University Bulletin, (14), pp. 114–119. (In Russ.)
  10. Ölziy, Zh. (1992) From the history of Mongolian monumental architecture. Ulaanbaatar: Soyombo Publ. (In Mong.)