The influence of philosophical movements and artistic traditions of China on the fine arts of the Khitan Liao Empire
Выпуск № 1 (32) 2024 журнала "Искусство Евразии"
HTML (Русский)
PDF (Русский)
JATS XML (Русский)
HTML (Русский)
PDF (Русский)
JATS XML (Русский)

Keywords

fine arts, Taoism, Confucianism, Buddhism, artistic tradition, Khitans, Liao Empire,

How to Cite

Hastuya L., Uranchimeg D. The influence of philosophical movements and artistic traditions of China on the fine arts of the Khitan Liao Empire // The Art of Eurasia, 2024. № 1 (32). P. 34-49. URL: https://doi.org/10.46748/ARTEURAS.2024.01.003.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...

Current Issue

Make a Submission

Abstract

The article discusses the development of fine arts among the Khitan people, who established the Liao Empire during the Middle Ages. The empire was located in modern-day Mongolia and Northern China, and was influenced by various cultural currents that impacted the spiritual life and creative activity of the Khitans to varying degrees. The article aims to analyse the process of intensive interaction between Khitans and Chinese culture, resulting in the formation of an original artistic tradition on local soil. This tradition was influenced by Taoism, Confucianism, and Buddhism in terms of world outlook. Analysis of this tradition allows us to conclude that Khitan artists took a selective approach to adapting motifs, style and visual content borrowed from Chinese art. The influence of Confucian teachings, manifested in the conscious affirmation of ideas of social order through artistic means, and the influence of Buddhism, which determined the nature of the artists’ world-view and contributed to the creation of the developed iconography, are shown. The conclusion is substantiated that the spiritual culture and art of the Khitan people represent a unique synthesis of different world-views and artistic traditions.

https://doi.org/10.46748/ARTEURAS.2024.01.003

References

  1. Duman, L.I. (1986) ‘Problems of foreign policy of the Khitans in the 7th – 10th centuries’, in Larichev, V.E. (ed.) East Asia and neighboring territories in the Middle Ages. Novosibirsk: Nauka, pp. 13–21. (In Russ.)
  2. Kradin, N.N., Ivliev, A.L. and Vasyutin, S.A. (2013) ‘Khitan cities of the late 10th – early 11th centuries in Central Mongolia and social processes on the periphery of the Liao Empire’, Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya Istoriya = Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Series History, (2), pp. 53–57. (In Russ.)
  3. Pikov, G.G. (2019) ‘On the question of relations between China and the Khitan people’, Rossiya i ATR = Russia and the Pacific, (4), pp. 95–108. doi:10.24411/1026-8804-2019-10056. (In Russ.)
  4. Valenstein, S.G. (2007) Cultural convergence in the Northern Qi period: a flamboyant Chinese ceramic container. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art.
  5. Zavadskaya, E.V. (1975) Aesthetic problems of painting in old China. Moscow: Iskusstvo. (In Russ.)
  6. Xiejun, C. and Qingzheng, W. (eds.) (2000) Treasures on grasslands: archaeological finds from the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region. Shanghai: Shanghai Museum.
  7. Shea, E.L. (2021) Mongol court dress, identity formation, and global exchange. Richmond Hill: Routledge.
  8. Shea, E.L. (2021) ‘Intentional identities: Liao women's dress and cultural and political power’, Acta Via Serica, 6(2), pp. 37–60.
  9. Guo, Ruoxu (1978) Paintings seen and heard. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)
  10. Panova, O.S. (2016) ‘On the problem of originality of Guo Ruoxu's “Experiences in Painting”’, Obshchestvo i gosudarstvo v Kitaye = Society and State in China, 46(1), pp. 565–569. (In Russ.)
  11. Liaoshangjing wen wu jie ying. (2005) Huhehaote shi: Yuanfang chuban she [Tang, C. (comp.) (2005) The Museum of Liaoshangjing: quintessence of the historical relic. Hohhot: Yuanfang Publishing House]. (In Chin.)
  12. Xuanhua Liao mu: 1974–1993 nian kaogu fajue baogao (xia ce) (2001) [Anon. (2001) Excavation report of the Liao Dynasty frescoed tombs at Xuanhua: report of archaeological excavation from 1974–1993, vol. 1. Cultural Relics Publishing House (Wenwu chubanshe)]. (In Chin.)
  13. Somkina, N.A. (2008) ‘Historical morphology of Chinese phoenix’, Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 9: Filologiya, vostokovedeniye, zhurnalistika = Vestnik (Herald) of Saint Petersburg University. Series 9. Philology. Oriental Studies. Journalism, (4-2), pp. 288–292. (In Russ.)
  14. Beguin, G. and Laureillard, M. (comps.) (2000) China, the glory of emperors. Paris: Paris-Museums. (In French)
  15. Steinhardt, N.S. (2004) ‘The Tang architectural icon and the politics of Chinese architectural history’, The Art Bulletin, 86(2), pp. 228–254.
  16. Patry Leidy, D. and Strahan, D. (eds.) (2010) Wisdom embodied: Chinese Buddhist and Daoist sculpture in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art. (In Russ.)