Abstract
This article analyses the development of the early landscape style of Japanese painter and calligrapher Ike Taiga (1723–1776), with a focus on his “Album of Taiga’s Drawings” (Taiga gafu) and three specific works from the collection of the Sakhalin Art Museum. As a pioneer of the Bunjinga (‘literati painting’) and Shinkeizu (‘true view’ or topographical painting) genres, Taiga synthesized Japanese, Chinese, and Korean traditions while incorporating elements of European fine art to create a highly original landscape style. The transformation of 18th-century Japanese landscape painting was driven by expanding cultural contacts, specifically the circulation of Chinese woodblock-printed albums and the introduction of European aesthetics through Dutch engravings. The study aims to identify the key factors that shaped Taiga’s early landscape style and to introduce works from the Sakhalin Art Museum into scientific circulation. The analysis focuses on pieces from the first volume of the “Album of Taiga’s Drawings”, which was published posthumously in 1803 by his pupil Geppo Shinryo. This edition was only the second comprehensive painting manual by a Japanese author, following Hayashi Moriatsu’s six-volume “Gasen” of 1721. The emergence of such albums marked a departure from the exclusive imitation of Chinese models and foreshadowed Katsushika Hokusai’s celebrated “Mangas” (1814–1819 and 1834–1878). However, to date, this album has not been the subject of a dedicated art-historical study. This research employs a multifaceted art-historical methodology. A compositional analysis was used to examine the structure of the artist’s album leaves, while a cultural-historical approach allowed for the identification of characteristic features of Taiga’s early landscapes within the broader evolution of Japanese painting and the formation of the Bunjinga genre. Furthermore, a stylistic and formal analysis was used to determine the primary expressive means of the works. The study identifies several formative landscape elements, specifically the rendering of trees and mountains, and highlights the influence of Far Eastern traditions and Western European art on Taiga’s artistic style. Through this analysis, the origins of the artist’s manner, which reached its full maturity in the landscapes of the 1760s and 1770s, are revealed.
References
- Voronova, B.G. (1975) Katsushika Hokusai. Graphic arts. Moscow: Iskusstvo Publ. (In Russ.)
- Zavyalova, N.A. (2017) ‘“Receptive aesthetics” of Japan and China in artifacts, words and symbols’, Culture and Art, (7), pp. 1–13. doi:10.7256/2454-0625.2017.7.23551. (In Russ.)
- Cherdakova, O.I. (2016) The role of the Chinese tradition in Japanese bunjinga painting of the 18th – first half of the 19th century. Cand. Sc. thesis (Art History). Moscow. (In Russ.)
- Shishkina, G.B. (1996) ‘Problems of attribution of Late Medieval Japanese painting’, in Kanevskaya, N.A. and Nikitina, E.N. (eds.) Scientific communications of the State Museum of Oriental Art. Issue 22: Problems of East and Southeast Asian Art. Moscow: State Museum of Oriental Art, pp. 232–243. (In Russ.)
- Postrelova, T.A. (1976) Academy of Painting in China in the 10th–13th centuries. Moscow: Nauka, Glavnaya redaktsiya vostochnoy literatury Publ. (In Russ.)
- Vinogradova, N.A. (1972) Chinese landscape painting. Moscow: Izobrazitel’noe Iskusstvo Publ. (In Russ.)
- Nikolaeva, N.S. (1989) Decorative painting of Japan of the 16th–18th centuries. From Kano Eitoku to Ogata Korin. Moscow: Izobrazitel’noe Iskusstvo Publ. (In Russ.)
- Nikolaeva, N.S. (1996) Japan – Europe. Dialogue in art. Moscow: Izobrazitel’noe Iskusstvo Publ. (In Russ.)
- Yonezawa, Y. and Yoshizawa, C. (1974) Japanese painting in the Literati style. New York: Weatherhill; Tokyo: Heibonsha.
- Takeuchi, M. (1992) Taiga’s true views. The language of landscape painting in eighteenth-century Japan. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
- Meccarelli, M. (2015) ‘Chinese painters in Nagasaki: style and artistic contamination during the Tokugawa Period (1603–1868)’, in Santangelo, P. (ed.) Ming Qing Studies 2015. Roma: Aracne Editrice, pp. 175–236.
- Singer, R.T. (1998) Edo: Art in Japan 1615–1868. Washington, D.C.: National Gallery of Art.
- Zavadskaya, E.V. (trans.) (2001) The Mustard Seed Garden manual of painting. Moscow: V. Shevchuk Publ. (In Russ.)
- Ahn, Hwi-Joon (2010) ‘Korean art: its characteristics and development’, in Arapova, T.B. (ed.) Wind in the pines… 5000 years of Korean art. From the National Museum of Korea [Exhibition catalogue]. Saint Petersburg: State Hermitage Publ., pp. 10–43. (In Russ.)
- Chung, Yang Mo (1993) ‘The art of everyday life’, in Kim, Hongnam (ed.) Korean arts of the eighteenth century: splendor and simplicity. New York: The Asia Society Galleries, pp. 59–77.
- Cooper, J. and Cooper, R. (1997) Masterpieces of Chinese art. Minsk: Belfax. (In Russ.)
- Miller, M. (2008) ‘Review of the book “Ike Taiga and Tokuyama Gyokuran: Japanese Masters of the Brush” by F. Fischer and K. Kinoshita’, сaa.reviews. (Published: August 5, 2008). Available from: https://www.caareviews.org/reviews/1146. doi:10.3202/caa.reviews.2008.75. (Accessed: 12 November 2025).
- Odinokova, P.S. (2017) ‘The album format in traditional Chinese art’, Decorative Art and Environment. Journal of the Stroganov Russian State University of Design and Applied Arts, (4-1), pp. 173–184. (In Russ.)
- Yoon, Yolsu and Eliseeva, I.A. (comps.) (2018) Territory of earthly hopes: Korean decorative painting of the 19th – early 20th century [Exhibition catalogue]. Seoul: Korea Foundation. (In Russ.)




