Abstract
The article examines the perception of military issues in German society during the Weimar Republic. It specifically focuses on the role of military and anti-war themes in the works of artists associated with the New Objectivity movement from the early to mid-20th century. The goal is to retrospectively analyse the works of these artists, who were active during the rise of Nazi ideology, in order to understand their perspective on contemporary events. The study primarily looks at the works of Otto Dix, Georg Grosz, and John Heartfield. The development of New Objectivity occurred during a time of intense political debates surrounding war and peace, which greatly influenced the movement's artistic agenda. For Otto Dix, this meant using art to remind and warn of the looming threat of war. On the other hand, Georg Grosz and John Heartfield saw their art as a means of asserting their own political beliefs, often getting involved in violent political struggles.
References
- Merkert, J. (Vw.) (1989) Stationen der Moderne. Die bedeutenden Kunstausstellungen des 20. Jahrhunderts in Deutschland, Kat. Berlinische Galerie 1988. 4. Auflage. Berlin: Berlinische Galerie; Museum für Moderne Kunst, Photographie und Architektur. (In Germ.)
- Murray, A. (2023) Otto Dix and the memorialization of World War I in German visual culture, 1914–1936. London: Bloomsbury Visual Arts.
- Tatar, M. (1994) ‘Fighting for life: figuration of war, women and the city in the work of Otto Dix’, German Politics & Society, Cultural Transformation and Cultural Politics in Weimar Germany, (32), pp. 28–57.
- Löffler, F. (Vf.) (1977) Otto Dix. Der Krieg. Radierungen, Zeichnungen. Albstadt: Städtische Galerie Albstadt. (In Germ.)
- Crockett, D. (1992) ‘The most famous painting of the “Golden Twenties”? Otto Dix and the Trench Affair’, Art Journal, 51(1), pp. 72–80.
- Marwick, A. (1995) ‘War and the arts – is there a connection? The case of the two Total Wars’, War in History, 2(1), pp. 65–86.
- Schwarz, B. (2012) ‘“Long live (occasionally) tendency in art”: Dix and the Dialectics of Modernism’, in Bulk, J. and Dyke, J. van. Otto Dix and the New Objectivity. Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz, pp. 62–71.
- Schubert, D. (2019) ‘Ein Schützengraben von 1916–1918: Julius Meier-Graefe und Otto Dix 1924’, Marburger Jahrbuch für Kunstwissenschaft, (45), pp. 275–304. (In Germ.)
- Büttner, N. (2012) ‘From the trenches into New Objectivity’, in Bulk, J. and Dyke, J. van. Otto Dix and the New Objectivity. Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz, pp. 72–83.
- Schubert, D. (2005) ‘Otto Dix – das Triptychon “Der Krieg” 1929–1932’, in Pfetsch, F.R. (Hrsg.) Konflikt. Berlin; Heidelberg: [u. a.], pp. 311–331. (In Germ.)
- Dyke, J.A. van. (2012) ‘Otto Dix’s folk culture’, in Bulk, J. and Dyke, J. van. Otto Dix and the New Objectivity. Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz, pp. 84–97.
- Lorenz, U., Dix, O. and Whitford, F. (2005) Otto Dix: Welt & Sinnlichkeit. Regensburg: Stiftung Kunstforum Ostdeutsche Galerie. (In Germ.)
- Merz, J.M. (1999) ‘Otto Dix' Kriegsbilder. Motivationen – Intentionen – Rezeptionen’, in: Herklotz, I. and Krause, K. (Hrsg.) Marburger Jahrbuch für Kunstwissenschaft. 26. Bd. Marburg: Verlag des Kunstgeschichtlichen Seminars der Philipps-Universität Marburg, pp. 189–226. doi:10.2307/1348710. (In Germ.)
- Rewald, S. and Buruma, I. (2022) George Grosz in Berlin: The relentless eye. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art.
- Buderer, H.-J. (1994) Neue Sachlichkeit. Bilder auf der Suche nach der Wirklichkeit: figurative Malerei der zwanziger Jahre. München – New York: Prestel Verlag. (In Germ.)
- Grosz, G. (1921) Das Gesicht der Herrschenden Klasse. 57 politische Zeichnungen. Berlin: Malik. (In Germ.)
- Knust, H. (1975) ‘George Grosz: literature and caricature’, Comparative literature studies, media and society: montage, satire and cultism between the Wars, 12(3), pp. 218–247.
- Blunck, L. and Pötzscher, A. (Hrsg.) Das XX. Jahrhundert — ein Jahrhundert Kunst in Deutschland: Altes Museum, neue Nationalgalerie, Hamburger Bahnhof. Berlin: Nationalgalerie. (In Germ.)
- Dabrowsky, M. (1993) ‘Photomonteur: John Heartfield’, MoMA, (13), pp. 12–15.
- Selz, P. (1963) ‘John Heartfield's “Photomontages”’, The Massachusetts Review, 4(2), pp. 309–336.
- Makarenko, K.V. (2017) ‘Crucifixion as motif in German painting and graphics of 1920–1940's’, in Bulletin of Saint-Petersburg State University of Culture, (4), pp. 118–121.
- Bürger, P. (2014) Theory of the avant-garde. Moscow: V-A-C Press. (In Russ.)
- Tretyakov, S. and Telingater, S. (1936) John Heartfield. Moscow: State Publishing House of Fine Arts. (In Russ.)
- Zervigon, A.M. (2012) John Heartfield and the agitated image: photography, persuasion, and the rise of avant-garde photomontage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.



