Spiritual and philosophical foundations of Russian traditional handicrafts and the problems of cultural inheritance
Выпуск № 3 (42) 2026 журнала "Искусство Евразии"
PDF (Русский)
JATS XML (Русский)
PDF (Русский)
JATS XML (Русский)

Keywords

cultural inheritance, traditional values, folk art, Orthodox worldview, Russian civilization, value-civilization approach,

How to Cite

Zakunov Y. A. Spiritual and philosophical foundations of Russian traditional handicrafts and the problems of cultural inheritance // The Art of Eurasia, 2026. № 3 (42). P. 82–101. URL: https://doi.org/10.46748/ARTEURAS.2026.03.004.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...

Current Issue

Make a Submission

Abstract

The relevance of this topic lies in the problem of preserving folk-art traditions in contemporary Russia. Traditional handicrafts are losing their identity: their spiritual, moral, and stylistic substance is being eroded by commercialization and by a departmental affiliation that fails to reflect their role as a national cultural code. The scientific novelty of this study lies in examining the problems of traditional art through the prism of cultural and philosophical conceptual frameworks, as well as the relatively new field of scholarly research: cultural inheritance. The core concepts of ‘givenness’, ‘predeterminedness’, and ‘implementation’ make it possible to systematize the practice of cultural inheritance, bring relevance to its study, and demonstrate its universal character, as well as the possibility of defining its main components in their uniqueness (inseparability) and unity (inseparability) as applied to the field of artistic creativity. The article emphasizes the Orthodox foundations of Russian folk art, which determine the integrity of its inheritance and are linked to the spiritual, aesthetic, and moral constants that shape Russia’s civilizational identity and its fundamental foundations. The study identifies pressing methodological and practical problems associated with the further development of traditional handicrafts and outlines fundamental paths toward their resolution. It is crucial to preserve culture as a holistic process, the primary substance of which lies not so much in external indicators as in an individual’s assimilation and cultivation of an inner, grace-filled, spiritual-psychological-corporeal creative act. This act possesses a distinct national character and is capable of integrating all layers and aspects of both the inheritance of tradition and creative renewal. This enables Russian folk art, permeated by the divine energies of the Most Holy Trinity, to endure as cultural heritage, serving as a driving force for the transfiguration of society and the human being.

https://doi.org/10.46748/ARTEURAS.2026.03.004

References

  1. Panarin, A.S. (2014) Orthodox civilisation. Moscow: Institute of Russian Civilisation. (In Russ.)
  2. Likhachev, D.S. (1989) Notes and observations. From notebooks of different years. Leningrad: Sovetskiy Pisatel. (In Russ.)
  3. Polyakova, E.A. and Andreychuk, N.M. (2022) ‘Traditional festivals of the peoples of Russia as a phenomenon of intangible cultural heritage’, in Gorlova, I.I., Zhitenyov, S.Yu. et al. (eds.) Encyclopaedia of intangible cultural heritage of Russia. Moscow: Heritage Institute, pp. 385–394. (In Russ.)
  4. Shafarevich, I.R. (2014) ‘Russia and the global catastrophe’, in Shafarevich, I.R. Complete works: in 6 vols, Vol. 2. Moscow: Institute of Russian Civilisation, pp. 55–158. (In Russ.)
  5. Zakunov, Yu.A. (2024) Modern processes of cultural inheritance in the context of the Russian civilisational alternative. Moscow: Heritage Institute. doi:10.34685/m2007-1519-0840-l. (In Russ.)
  6. Gulyga, A.V. (1995) The Russian idea and its creators. Moscow: Soratnik. (In Russ.)
  7. Zenkovsky, V.V. (1991) History of Russian philosophy: in 2 vols, Vol. 1, pt. 1. Leningrad: Ego. (In Russ.)
  8. Zakunov, Yu.A. (2021) ‘The role of domestic axiology and spiritual heritage in the integration of modern society and the practice of cultural construction’, in Gorlova, I.I. (ed.) The cultural heritage of the North Caucasus as a resource for the interethnic concord. Moscow: Heritage Institute, pp. 92–116. (In Russ.)
  9. Palushinska, A. (2015) ‘The teaching of Gregory Palamas as a rejection of Origenism’, in Dushin, O.E. (ed.) Meister Eckhart and St. Gregory Palamas: relevance of spiritual experience [Almanac]. Pskov: Pskov State University Publishing House, pp. 163–169. (VERBUM. Issue 17). (In Russ.)
  10. Kapitanchuk, V.A. (2018) Iconology of the created world. Moscow: Izdatelskie Resheniya (Ridero). (In Russ.)
  11. Rybakov, N.S. (2008) Cogito. Selected works on philosophy. Pskov: Logos. (In Russ.)
  12. Pozov, A.S. (Avraam Pozidis) (2008) Foundations of ancient church anthropology: in 2 vols, Vol. 1: Son of man. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Publishing House. (In Russ.)
  13. Kuchmaeva, I.K. (2006) Social regularities and mechanisms of cultural inheritance. Moscow: State Academy of Slavic Culture. (In Russ.)
  14. Likhachev, D.S. (1992) Russian art from antiquity to the avant-garde. Moscow: Iskusstvo. (In Russ.)
  15. Raznitsyna, E.M. and Moskovskaya, G.P. (2023) ‘The importance of lighting devices in the interior space’, Vestnik of Gzhel State University, (3), pp. 124–134. (In Russ.)
  16. Nekrasova, M.A. (2006) ‘People’s art and Orthodoxy. The integrity of the image of the world. Research methodology’, Traditsii i Sovremennost = Traditions and Modernity, (5), pp. 3–15. (In Russ.)
  17. Zakunov, Yu.A. (2024) ‘Triune foundations of preserving and strengthening traditional Russian spiritual, moral, cultural and historical values’, in Aristarkhov, V.V. et al. (eds.) 6th Russian Cultural Congress with International Participation ‘Cultural identity in the space of tradition and innovation’: programme, abstracts of papers. Moscow: Heritage Institute, p. 91. doi:10.34685/HI.2024.73.51.002. (In Russ.)