Stylistic and iconographic features and evolution of the Luccan school of painting through the example of painted crosses made by the Berlinghieri's workshop
Выпуск № 2 (33) 2024 журнала "Искусство Евразии"
HTML (Русский)
PDF (Русский)
JATS XML (Русский)
HTML (Русский)
PDF (Русский)
JATS XML (Русский)

Keywords

Luccan school of painting, painted cross, croce dipinta, Ducento painting, Berlinghiero Berlinghieri, Berlinghieri's workshop, stylistic analysis, iconographic features,

How to Cite

Matveeva E. V. Stylistic and iconographic features and evolution of the Luccan school of painting through the example of painted crosses made by the Berlinghieri’s workshop // The Art of Eurasia, 2024. № 2 (33). P. 36–53. URL: https://doi.org/10.46748/ARTEURAS.2024.02.002.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...

Current Issue

Make a Submission

Abstract

The article analyses the formal, stylistic, and iconographic features of the Luccan school of painting. The study focuses on the painted crosses made by the Berlingieri workshop in the 13th century, which marked the “golden age” of Luccan artistic culture. Among the main schools of painting that emerged in Tuscany in the 13th century, the Pisan, Sienese and Florentine schools are widely studied in art history literature, while the Luccan school is often overlooked. However, during the period in question it was at its peak, which was associated with the workshop founded by Berlinghiero Berlinghieri, also known as Berlinghiero di Milanese. Berlingieri's workshop created a numerous painted crosses, which are the subject of this study. Painted crosses, also known as croci dipinte, were a significant phenomenon in Italy's artistic and religious life during the 12th–14th centuries. They were particularly popular in Umbria and Tuscany. However, in order to analyse their formal, stylistic and iconographic features, which are the subject of the study, earlier examples of painted crosses of the Luccan school, as well as some iconic monuments of a similar kind, executed later, were also involved. This made it possible to trace the characteristic features and evolution of the Luccan school of painting. The study employed formal-stylistic, iconographic, and comparative methods. The study's results provide insight into the significance of Berlingieri's workshop within the Luccan painting tradition and allow us to evaluate its peculiarities and outline the ways of further research.

https://doi.org/10.46748/ARTEURAS.2024.02.002

References

  1. Cavalcaselle, G.B. and Crowe, A. (1899) Storia della pittura in Italia dal secolo II al secolo XVI. Vol. 3: I pittori della Scuola senese nel secolo XIV e ne' primi onni del seguente, ed alcuni altri di Pisa e di Lucca seguaci di quella maniera. Firenze: Le Monnier. (In Ital.)
  2. Venturi, A. (1907) Storia dell'arte italiana. Vol. 5: La pittura del Trecento e le sue origini: Con 818 incisioni in fototipografia. Milano: Hoepli. (In Ital.)
  3. Marle, R. van (1925) The development of the Italian schools of painting, vol. 5. Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. (In Ital.)
  4. Sandberg-Vavalà, E. (1985) La croce dipinta italiana e l'iconografia della passione: Con 585 illustrazioni e 4 tavole fuori testo. Roma: Multigrafica. (In Ital.)
  5. Monciatti, A. (2012) ‘Le croci dipinte di area lucchese: modelli e tipi figurali nel XII secolo’, in Frosinini, C., Monciatti, A. and Wolf, G. (eds.) La pittura su tavola del XII secolo. Riconsiderazioni e nuove acquisizioni a seguito del restauro della croce di Rosano. Firenze: Edifir, pp. 163–173. (In Ital.)
  6. Сaleca, A. (1986) ‘Pittura del Duecento e del Trecento a Pisa e a Lucca’ in Castelnuovo, E. La pittura in Italia: il Duecento e il Trecento, in 2 vols., vol. 1. Milano: Electa, pp. 233–264. (In Ital.)
  7. Bellosi, L. (1991) ‘Per un contesto cimabuesco senese: b) Rinaldo da Siena e Guido di Graziano’, Prospettiva, (62), pp. 15–28. (In Ital.)
  8. Angiola, E.M. (1980) ‘Nuovi documenti su Bonaventura e Marco di Berlinghiero’, Prospettiva, (21), pp. 82–84. (In Ital.)
  9. Tartuferi, A. (2022) ‘Il Crocifisso di Fucecchio: un problema di pittura lucchese’, in Acidini, C. and Bellesi, S. (eds.) Scoperte e ritorni. Scritti in memoria di Alberto Bruschi. Firenze: Edizioni Polistampa, pp. 10–16. (In Ital.)
  10. Toesca, P. (1951) Storia dell'arte italiana. Vol. 2: Il trecento. Torino: Unione Tipografico-Editrice Torinese. (In Ital.)
  11. Venturi, L. (1926) Il gusto dei primitivi. Bologna: Zanichelli. (In Ital.)
  12. Castelli, C., Parri, M. and Santacesaria, A. (2007) ‘Il supporto ligneo della Croce di Rosano. Tecnica e confronti’, in Ciatti, M., Frosinini, C. and Bellucci, R. (eds.) La Croce dell’Abbazia di Rosano. Visibile e invisibile. Studio e restauro per la comprensione. Firenze: Edifir, pp. 105–110. (In Ital.)
  13. Tartuferi, A. (2007) Il Maestro del Bigallo e la pittura della prima metà del Duecento agli Uffizi. Firenze: Polistampa. (In Ital.)