Abstract
The aim of the reconstruction study is to identify and characterize the mythopoetic trend in the fine arts of Kalmykia in the second half of the 20th century. The relevance and novelty of the topic are determined by the need to study the little-covered aspects of the development of Kalmyk art of this period. The methodology of the historical and cultural approach is based on the principles of system analysis of processes and phenomena of art, applying methods of art history, cultural studies, philosophy, and sociology. Works from museum and private collections make it possible to trace local features of the development of art in Kalmykia in the second half of the 20th century. The surviving relics of the figurative thinking of the older generation give rise to creative searches leading from the traditions of socialist realism to the phenomenon of the archaic mythopoetic space in works of painting and graphics. Generated by pre-Buddhist archaism, which entered the world-view of Buddhism, figurative memory preserves mythological foundations, determining the development of contemporary Kalmyk art. The study found that it is this continuity that inspires the message of revival among the artists of the 1960s, who restored the mythopoetic integrity of culture as the basis for the creativity of the generation of the 1970s. The search for ethnic identity, identified with the artistic movement of “cultural nomadism” in Kalmyk art of the 1980s and 1990s, brings a new wave of revival of mythological consciousness. It is characterized by an appeal to the ancient Mongolian sources of Kalmyk culture, expressed in artistic motifs associated with the history and heritage of ancestors. In the era of globalization, this trend is comprehended as part of an expanded understanding of the ethnic identity of modern nomads in the context of world culture. The world-view of Kalmyk artists, open to these trends, is combined with the postmodernist trends of the turn of the 20th and 21st centuries; in creative searches, a new view of continuity in art is born, the analysis of which is of interest to art criticism.
References
- Sychev, D.V. (1970) Kalmyk folk art. Elista: Kalmizdat; Ministry of Culture of the KASSR; Republican Museum of Local Lore. (In Russ.)
- Kovalev, I.G. (1970) Kalmyk folk ornament. Elista: Kalmizdat. (In Russ.)
- Troshin, I.I. (1970) Essays on the fine arts of Kalmykia. Volgograd: Volgogradskaya Pravda. (In Russ.)
- Kocheshkov, N.V. (1979) Decorative art of Mongolian-speaking peoples of the 19th – mid-20th centuries. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)
- Batyreva, S.G. (2014) Fine art of Kalmykia in the 20th century (1957–2000). Elista: KIGI RAS. (In Russ.)
- Batyreva, S.G. (2025) Painting in time and space of culture. Works of the People's Artist of the RSFSR Garya Rokchinsky (1923–1993). Moscow: Bumba. (In Russ.)
- Tserenov, V.Z. (comp.) (1992) The world of epics. About V.A. Favorsky's work on “Dzhangar” and his trip to Kalmykia. Elista: Kalmyk Book Publishing House. (In Russ.)
- Kagan, M.S. (1987) ‘Art in the system of culture’, in Kagan, M.S. (ed.) Art in the system of culture. Leningrad: Nauka, pp. 6–22. (In Russ.)
- Likhachev, D.S. (1984) Notes on Russian. Moscow: Sovetskaya Rossiya. (In Russ.)
- Shchedrina, G.K. (1987) ‘Art as an ethnocultural phenomenon’, in Kagan, M.S. (ed.) Art in the system of culture. Leningrad: Nauka, pp. 41–47. (In Russ.)
- Markaryan, E.S. (1981) ‘Key issues of the theory of cultural tradition’, Soviet Ethnography, (2), pp. 78–97. (In Russ.)
- Etkind, A.M. (1987) ‘Art as a self-awareness of culture’, in Kagan, M.S. (ed.) Art in the system of culture. Leningrad: Nauka, pp. 85–92. (In Russ.)
- Grigoriev, N.V. (1987) ‘The relationship between myth and art in culture: historical and typological aspect’, in Kagan, M.S. (ed.) Art in the system of culture. Leningrad: Nauka, pp. 99–104. (In Russ.)
- Meletinsky, E.M. (1982) ‘Mythical time’, in Tokarev, S.A. (ed.) Myths of the peoples of the world, in 2 vols, vol. 2. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 252–253. (In Russ.)
- Eliade, M. (1994) Sacred and profane. Moscow: Moscow State University Publ. (In Russ.)
- Lotman, Yu.M. (1998) About art. Saint Petersburg: Iskusstvo – SPb. (In Russ.)
- Lotman, Yu.M. and Uspensky, B.M. (1973) ‘Myth – name – culture’, in Lotman, Yu.M. (ed.) Scientific notes of Tartu University, issue 6. Tartu: Tartu University, pp. 282–303. (In Russ.)
- Toporov, V.N. (1964) ‘On the reconstruction of some mythological ideas based on materials of Buddhist art’, Narody Azii i Afriki = Peoples of Asia and Africa, (3), pp. 101–110. (In Russ.)
- Toporov, V.N. (1992) ‘Space’, in Tokarev, S.A. (ed.) Myths of the peoples of the world, in 2 vols, vol. 2. Moscow: Soviet Encyclopedia, pp. 340–342. (In Russ.)
- Kichigina, A.G. (2007) ‘The phenomenon of neo-archaism in contemporary art of Siberia’, Omsk Scientific Bulletin, (1), pp. 183–187. (In Russ.)
- Chirkov, V.F. and Galygina, O.M. (2025) ‘Mythological content of works of “Siberian neoarchaic”: on the study of this the artistic direction’, Iskusstvo Evrazii = The Art of Eurasia, (1), pp. 210–239. doi:10.46748/ARTEURAS.2025.01.013. (In Russ.)
- Matotchkin, E.P. (2010) ‘Archaeoart of Siberia’, Vestnik Tyumenckogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Tyumen State University, (5), pp. 227–232. (In Russ.)
- Levi-Strauss, K. (1994) Primitive thinking. Moscow: Respublika. (In Russ.)
- Shishin, M.Yu. (2017) ‘The main features of the style “metahistorical expressionism” and its manifestation in the art of the contemporary artists of Siberia and Mongolia’, Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Theory & Practice, (11), pp. 208–212. (In Russ.)
- Shishin, M.Yu., Belokurova, S.B., Uranchimeg, D. and Makarova, E.V. (eds.) (2018) Art of Siberia and Mongolia of the 20th – early 21st centuries: essays on history and theory. Barnaul: Altai State Technical University. (In Russ.)
- Borisova, A.A. (2025) ‘The artistic space in the graphic works of the Yukaghir artist N.N. Kurilov’, Iskusstvo Evrazii = The Art of Eurasia, (1), pp. 70–83. doi:10.46748/ARTEURAS.2025.01.005. (In Russ.)
- Lebedeva, E.V. (2025) ‘The image of the world in Altai graphics: ethnoarchaism in contemporary art’, Iskusstvo Evrazii = The Art of Eurasia, (1), pp. 136–159. doi:10.46748/ARTEURAS.2025.01.009. (In Russ.)
- Tabunova, N.A. (2025) ‘From antiquity to modernity: a neomythological perspective in contemporary art’, Iskusstvo Evrazii = The Art of Eurasia, (1), pp. 178–195. doi:10.46748/ARTEURAS.2025.01.011. (In Russ.)
- Gantulga, D. (2017) Mongolians in the vast space of the world. Ulaanbaatar: Golden Legion Publ. (In Mong.)
- Lbova, L.V. (2023) ‘Artistic forms of the Siberian Ice Age as a way of self-identification of man and society: objects of personal ornamentation’, Iskusstvo Evrazii = The Art of Eurasia, (3), pp. 22–33. doi:10.46748/ARTEURAS.2023.03.002. (In Russ.)
- Batyreva, S.G. (2021) ‘“Dzhangariada” by V.A. Favorsky in the history of fine art of Kalmykia in the 1930s and 1940s’, Mongolica, 24(1), pp. 26–37. (In Russ.)
- Favorsky, V.A. (1982) ‘How I worked on “Dzhangar”’, in Shirokov, Yu.A. (comp.) The East in the works of V.A. Favorsky. Moscow: Sovetskiy khudozhnik, pp. 16–21. (In Russ.)
- Murina, E.B. (1992) ‘A living sense of the epic’, in Tserenov, V.Z. (comp.) The world of the epic. About V.A. Favorsky’s work on “Dzhangar” and his trip to Kalmykia. Elista: Kalmyk Book Publishing House, pp. 107–114. (In Russ.)
- Kichikov, A.Sh. (1998) ‘The figurative memory of the people as a sign of culture’, in Dukmanova, Z.K. and Batyreva, S.G. (comps.) The figurative memory of the people. Elista: Dzhangar Publ., pp. 7–8. (In Russ.)
- Batyreva, S.G. (2004) Figurative memory of ancestors. Paintings by Garya Rokchinsky in time and space of Kalmyk traditional culture. Elista: Dzhangar. (In Russ.)
- Batrakova, S.P. (2002) Art and myth: from the history of painting of the twentieth century. Moscow: Iskusstvo. (In Russ.)
- Mirimanov, V.B. (1997) Art and myth. The central image of the picture of the world. Moscow: Soglasiye. (In Russ.)
- Batyreva, S.G. and Batyreva, K.P. (2017) ‘“Cultural nomadism” in the visual arts of kalmykia in the 1980–1990s’, Mongolovedenie = Mongolian Studies, (9), pp. 56–69. (In Russ.)
- Batyreva, S.G. (2017) ‘Traditions in art as a factor in the dialogue of ethnic cultures’, in Gorlova, I.I. (ed.) Cultural heritage of the North Caucasus as a resource for interethnic harmony. Gelendzhik: Rodnye traditsii, pp. 237–242. (In Russ.)
- Loginova, M.V. and Svyatogorova, V.S. (2012) ‘Ontologization of myth in the modern art of Mordovia’, Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk = News of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 14(2-4), pp. 1075–1077. (In Russ.)
- Batrakova, S.P. (2002) Art and myth: from the history of painting of the twentieth century. Moscow: Iskusstvo. (In Russ.)
- Lavrin, A. (comp.) (2009) Dmitry Sandzhiev. Painting, graphics. Moscow: M-Scanrus. (In Russ.)
- Pershits, A.I. (1981) ‘Dynamics of traditions and possibilities of their source study interpretation’, Narody Azii i Afriki = Peoples of Asia and Africa, (5), pp. 81–92. (In Russ.)
- Maksimov, K.N. and Ochirova, N.G. (eds.) (2009) History of Kalmykia from ancient times to the present day, in 3 vols, vol. 3. Elista: Gerel. (In Russ.)
- Batyreva, S.G. (2018) ‘Epic and artist: in search of archetype’, in Kocheva, T.I. (ed.) Scientific heritage of I.I. Soktoeva in light of current problems of contemporary fine art. Ulan-Ude: Buryat State University Publ., pp. 130–139. (In Russ.)



