Simple things and metaphysical still life in Moscow art of the 1960s and 1970s
Выпуск № 4 (31) 2023 журнала "Искусство Евразии"
HTML (Русский)
PDF (Русский)
JATS XML (Русский)
HTML (Русский)
PDF (Русский)
JATS XML (Русский)

Keywords

still life, simple things, underground, metaphysical painting, conceptualism, V.F. Stozharov, A.V. Vasnetsov, O.Y. Rabin, M.A. Roginsky, A.B. Grositsky, V.G. Veisberg, D.M. Krasnopevtsev,

How to Cite

Yushkova O. A. Simple things and metaphysical still life in Moscow art of the 1960s and 1970s // The Art of Eurasia, 2023. № 4 (31). P. 280-295. URL: https://doi.org/10.46748/ARTEURAS.2023.04.018.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...

Current Issue

Make a Submission

Abstract

The article examines the issue of artists from diverse backgrounds exploring the theme of “simple things” through still life paintings during the 1960s–1970s. Typically, each artistic style is evaluated in isolation from the wider artistic process. However, the author employs still life artwork as a case study to track how the challenges of that period were translated in the work of artists from the official sphere, the austere movement, and various underground movements.

Simple things naturally drew attention after almost three decades of thematic painting dominating in Soviet art. In the Thaw period, small genres, where expression of a personal worldview wasn't hampered by larger themes, gained appreciation.

This article analyses the approach to still life featuring simple objects by V.F. Stozharov, A.V. Vasnetsov, O.Y. Rabin, M.A. Roginsky, A.B. Grositsky, V.G. Veisberg and D.M. Krasnopevtsev.

It is evident that V.F. Stozharov, a member of the official circle of artists, focuses on expressing the national character through Old Russian life objects. A.V. Vasnetsov, on the other hand, conveys the atmosphere of homely warmth in his still lifes, which was highly valued during that era. M.A. Roginsky is an underground artist whose work defies categorization. Through depictions of everyday life in the aftermath of war, Roginsky exhibits a deep understanding of the foundations of Russian society without resorting to criticism, mockery, or excessive enthusiasm. V.G. Veisberg and D.M. Krasnopevtsev embodied the key positions of the metaphysical trend within the underground still life genre, focused on existential worldviews.

This demonstrates how still life not only resurfaces as an important artistic genre but also proves to be a diverse enough form to express a range of positions and issues in its contemporary era, with everyday objects acting as their metaphors.

https://doi.org/10.46748/ARTEURAS.2023.04.018

References

  1. Whipper, B.R. (2005) Problem and development of still life. Saint Petersburg: Azbuka-klassika. (In Russ.)
  2. Lotman, Yu.M. (1986) ‘Still life in the perspective of semiotics’, in Danilova, I.E. (ed.) A thing in art [Conference proceedings]. Moscow: Sovetskiy khudozhnik, pp. 6–13. (In Russ.)
  3. Mochalov, L.V. (2012) Three centuries of Russian still life. Moscow: Belyy gorod. (In Russ.)
  4. Gerchuk, Yu.Ya. (1977) Living things. Moscow: Soviet artist. (In Russ.)
  5. Daniel, S.M. (1986) Painting of the classical era: problems of composition in Western European painting of the 17th century. Leningrad: Iskusstvo. (In Russ.)
  6. Gerchuk, Yu.Ya. (2008) “Hemorrhage in the MOSH”, or Khrushchev in the Manege. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye. (In Russ.)
  7. Glezer, A.A. (1991) Russian artists in the West. Moscow: Znaniye. (In Russ.)
  8. Levashov, V. (2009) ‘Interview with Mikhail Roginsky’, in Romanova, A. and Vasilevskaya, N. (comps.) About Mikhail Roginsky. Fools eat pies. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye, pp. 690–691. (In Russ.)
  9. Barabanov, E. (2007) ‘Biographies of things’, in Andrey Grositsky [Catalogue]. Moscow: Gallery pop/off/art, pp. 5–17. (In Russ.)
  10. Inshakov, A. (2006) ‘“Artists of the first class” and the boundaries of freedom (“Ten Characters” by Ilya Kabakov)’, in Dekhtereva, A. and Stepanyan, N. (eds.) Paths and crossroads. Research and materials on Russian art of the twentieth century. Moscow: Indrik, pp. 178–198. (In Russ.)
  11. Talochkin, L. and Alpatova, I. (comps.) (1991) Other art, Moscow, 1956–76, in 2 volumes. Vol. 1: To the chronicle of artistic life. Moscow: Interbook. (In Russ.)
  12. Chudetskaya, A. (2006) ‘Art is a kind of knowledge’, in Dobrovinskaya-Vladimirova, T.E., Chudetskaya, A.Yu. and Shklovskaya, E.L. (comps.) Vladimir Grigorievich Veisberg. Painting, graphics from museum and private collections. Moscow: Azbuka, pp. 12–16. (In Russ.)
  13. Manevich, G. (1991) ‘The color of the past tense’, in Talochkin, L. and Alpatova, I. (comps.) (1991) Other art, Moscow, 1956–76, in 2 volumes. Vol. 1: To the chronicle of artistic life. Moscow: Interbook, pp. 138–257. (In Russ.)
  14. Krasnopevtsev, D.M. (2006) Dmitry Krasnopevtsev: painting, graphics, diaries, in 3 books. Book 1: Diaries, 1952–1993. Moscow: Bonfi. (In Russ.)