The image of Berlin in the works of “New objectivity” artists of the 1920-s: УДК 7.037(430)
№ 1 (16) 2020 "Искусство Евразии", научный журнал об искусстве.
PDF (Russian)
PDF (Russian)

Keywords

New objectivity, German art of the 1920s, the image of Berlin

Categories

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Belikova, M.A. (2020) ‘The image of Berlin in the works of “New objectivity” artists of the 1920-s: УДК 7.037(430)’, The Art of Eurasia, (1), pp. 212–226. doi:10.25712/ASTU.2518-7767.2020.01.016.

Индексация статей

Белый списокScience IndexDimensionsDOAJOpenAlexScilitКиберЛенинкаEBSCOCrossrefDataCiteInternet Archive ScholarGoogle Scholar
Open Access
Антиплагиат

* Not an advertisement

Abstract

The article deals with the works of new objectivity artists, which reflect Berlin urban life of the 1920s. The author analyses the works by G. Grosz, R. Schlichter, K. Hubbuch, O. Dix, G. Wunderwald devoted to urban themes within the period of their residence in the capital of Weimar Germany. Being in ideological opposition to expressionism both as a style and worldview, the above-mentioned authors created in their works a different image of Berlin, filled not with subjective experiences and impressions, but rather constructed from the  “objective” features of the metropolitan life. In their effort to record the surrounding reality, the artists critically approached the choice of urban life’s subjects, preferring mainly themes of social and critical orientation. In this regard, against the backdrop of left-wing ideas, artists were tend to depict the problems of class inequality, social insecurity, poverty, prostitution, which clearly manifested themselves in Berlin life of the 1920s. Thus, artists turned into a kind of painters of everyday life scenes of the metropolis and captured in their works not only the life and views of the central, most famous and attractive Berlin areas, but also its most unsightly industrial suburbs, where the underclass lived. In the course of the  analysis, the author reveals the aesthetics intrinsic to the most of the works under consideration – the so-called aesthetics of the “ugliness”.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25712/ASTU.2518-7767.2020.01.016

References

  1. Benjamin V. Kratkaya istoriya fotografii [Brief History of Photography]. Moscow, Ad Marginem, 2013. 144 p. (In Russian)
  2. Funkenstein S. Fashionable Dancing: Gender, the Charleston, and German Identity in Otto Dix's “Metropolis”. German Studies Review, 2005, vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 20–44. (In English)
  3. George Grosz. Berlin – New York. (Ausst. Kat. Berlin, D?sseldorf, Stuttgart, hrsg. von Peter-Klaus Schuster, 1994/1995). Berlin, 1995, 2. Aufl. 590 S. (In German)
  4. Gustav Wunderwald. Gem?lde – Handzeichnungen – Buhnenbilder (Ausst. – Kat. Berlinische Galerie. St?dtische Galerie Albstadt). Berlin, Berlinische Galerie, 1982. 134 S. (In German)
  5. Heller R. Art in Germany (1909–1936). From Expressionism to Resistance: the Marvin and Janet Fishmann collection. Munich, Prestel Verlag, 1990. 271 p. (In English)
  6. Ich und die Stadt. Mensch und Gro?stadt in der deutschen Kunst des 20. Jahrhunderts, hg. von Eberhard Roters und Bernhard Schulz (Ausst. – Kat. Berlinische Galerie, Martin-Gropius-Bau, Berlin). Berlin, Berlinische Galerie, 1987. 404 S. (In German)
  7. Meidner L. Anleitung zum Malen Gro?stadtbildern. Kunst und K?nstler, 1914, No. 5, S. 312–314. (In German)
  8. Poore C. Disability in Twentieth-Century German Culture. Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 2007. 407 p. (In English)
  9. Realismus: zwischen Revolution und Reaktion 1919–1939 (Ausst. – Kat. Centres Georges Pompidou, Paris/Staatliche Kunsthalle). Berlin, M?nchen, Prestel, 1981. 542 S. (In German)
  10. Rowe D. Representing Berlin: Sexuality and the City in Imperial and Weimar Germany. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2003. 203 p. (In German)
  11. Schmidt P. Die deutschen Veristen. Das Kunstblatt, 1924, Heft 12, S. 367–372. (In German)