Traditions of Far Eastern jewelry in the costume of the peoples of Amur in the 19th – beginning of 20th centuries: УДК 745:739.2(282.257.5)
Выпуск № 4 (23) журнала «Искусство Евразии»
PDF (Russian)
HTML (Russian)
PDF (Russian)
HTML (Russian)

Keywords

jewelry, Tungus-Manchu peoples, traditional culture, museum collections, stock collections, semantics of jewelry

Categories

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Pankratieva, N.A. (2021) ‘Traditions of Far Eastern jewelry in the costume of the peoples of Amur in the 19th – beginning of 20th centuries: УДК 745:739.2(282.257.5)’, The Art of Eurasia, (4), pp. 158–169. doi:10.46748/ARTEURAS.2021.04.012.

Индексация статей

Белый списокScience IndexDimensionsDOAJOpenAlexScilitКиберЛенинкаEBSCOCrossrefDataCiteInternet Archive ScholarGoogle Scholar
Open Access
Антиплагиат

* Not an advertisement

Abstract

Jewelry of the Amur peoples is an important element of traditional culture, formed under the influence of aesthetic ideals and reflecting the commonality of the Tungus-Manchurian world. Despite the vastness of the territories and the appearance of new political borders in the 19th century, the semantics of jewelry of traditional costume was understandable both to the aboriginal population of the Ussuri Region and to the urbanized stratum of the Manchus who mastered the cities of Qing China. The research is based on items from the stock collections of the Arsenyev Museum of the History of the Far East, some of which were not previously presented to the wide public. Today, it is the museum collections formed in the 19th – first half of the 20th centuries that have become the basis for studying the technology and semantics of jewelry of the peoples of the Far East. In the production of jewelry that existed among the indigenous peoples of the Far East, a wide variety of technologies were used, and the place of production depended on their complexity. Either they were professional jewelry manufactories of Manchurian China, or Nanai and Udege craftsmen who worked in the camps. And in this context, we can talk about broad trade relations that existed due to the turnover of jewelry. The durability of the materials used in the creation of works of jewelry art has become an important factor in the continuity of cultural paradigms with the change of generations. The jewelry complex that developed in the Far East in the Middle Ages lasted for several centuries, survived a series of state formations and survived until the 20th century, until the civilizational scrapping replaced the traditional way of life of hunters and fishermen, along with the costume, from everyday use.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46748/ARTEURAS.2021.04.012

References

  1. Arseniev V.K. Kitaytsy v Ussuriyskom kraye [The Chinese in the Ussuri region]. Khabarovsk, Priamurskiy Governor-General Publ., 1914. 203 p. (In Russian).
  2. Brailovsky S.N. Tazy ili yguhe: Opyt etnograficheskogo issledovaniya [Tazy or yguhe: An Ethnographic Research Experience]. St. Petersburg, Printing house of Prince V.P. Meshchersky, 1902. 223 p. (In Russian).
  3. Mikhailova E.A. Syemnyye ukrasheniya narodov Sibiri [Removable jewelry of the peoples of Siberia]. Available at: Electronic library of the Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography. Peter the Great (Kunstkamera) RAS, URL http://www.kunstkamera.ru/lib/rubrikator/08/08_03/5-88431-129-x (Accessed 09.03.2021). (In Russian).
  4. Neglinskaya M.A. Kitayskiye yuvelirnyye ukrasheniya perioda Tsin (XVII – nachala XX v.). Istoriya, semantika, estetika [Chinese jewelry of the Qing period (17th – early 20th century). History, semantics, aesthetics]. Moscow, Sputnik + Company, 1999. 262 p. (In Russian).
  5. Pankratieva N.A. Problemy komplektovaniya etnograficheskoy kollektsii Primorskogo krayevogo muzeya im. V.K. Arsen'yeva v seredine XX veka [Problems of acquiring the ethnographic collection of the Primorsky Regional Museum. V.K. Arseniev in the middle of the twentieth century]. Kavetskaya V.V. (comp.). Arsen'yevskiye chteniya [Arseniev readings: Conference proceedings]. Vladivostok, Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service, 2019, pp. 110–120. (In Russian).
  6. Sem Yu.M. Nanaytsy. Material'naya kul'tura. (Vtoraya polovina XIX – seredina XX v.) [Nanai. Material culture. (Second half of the 19th – mid-20th centuries). Ethnographic essays]. Vladivostok, [Magadan region PH, 1973. 314 p. (In Russian).
  7. Smolyak. A.V. Traditsionnoye khozyaystvo i material'naya kul'tura narodov Nizhnego Amura i Sakhalina: etnogeneticheskiy aspekt [Traditional economy and material culture of the peoples of the Lower Amur and Sakhalin: ethnogenetic aspect]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1984. 246 p. (In Russian).
  8. Somkina N.A. Traditsii zoomorfnoy simvoliki v obryadovoy storone povsednevnykh verovaniy (staryy Kitay i sovremennost') [Traditions of zoomorphic symbolism in the ritual side of everyday beliefs (old China and modernity)]. Vestnik SPbGU — Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University, Series 13, 2010, No. 1, pp. 30–46. (In Russian).