* Not an advertisement
Abstract
This article examines the role of feitian (celestial beings of the Buddhist pantheon) in the organisation of the upper register in two Tang-period Mogao caves: Cave 220 of the Early Tang and Cave 103 of the High Tang. Dunhuang art is understood here not as a mere collection of separate murals and sculptures but as an integrated Buddhist cave ensemble in which architecture, painting, sculpture, ornament, and the viewer’s route of perception form a single visual system. Feitian are treated as celestial beings and active participants in Buddhist pictorial space: they fly, dance, play music, scatter flowers, and make offerings to the Buddha. In the Mogao caves, these figures appear on ceilings, above niches, and in the upper zones of wall paintings, so their function cannot be reduced to decoration. The purpose of the article is to show how feitian participate in constructing the visual order of a specific cave ensemble. The study is based on published research on Dunhuang murals, spatial experience in Mogao, and the iconography of the Vimalakirti Sutra, together with a visual comparison of the two cave compositions. The analysis follows four parameters: the position of the figures within the cave, the character of movement, their relation to the entrance and niche, and their role in shaping the upper register as a whole. The comparison demonstrates that in Cave 220 the feitian form a distributed upper belt connecting the southern, northern, and western zones and supporting the polycentric structure of the Early Tang ensemble. In Cave 103, their role becomes more localized: the figures emphasize the upper part of the north wall and are subordinated to the more concentrated visual order of the High Tang. Feitian thus appear not as a secondary ornamental motif but as an indicator of changing spatial logic in Dunhuang mural painting.
References
- Merekina, O.O. and Panova, O.S. (2022) ‘Perception of the Mogao Caves’ art heritage in Republican China (1911–1949): From obscurity to national treasure’, Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art, 12, pp. 574–584. doi:10.18688/aa2212-06-45. (In Russ.)
- Fan, Jun (2025) ‘The revival of Dunhuang dance in contemporary choreography in China’, Pan-Art, 5(3). doi:10.30853/pa20250053. (In Russ.)
- Ivanova, Y.V. (2025) ‘Dunhuang in the digital age: The mediatization of sacred heritage and China’s cultural diplomacy’, Culture and Art, (10), pp. 66–78. doi:10.7256/2454-0625.2025.10.76334. (In Russ.)
- Zhao Yanlin. Mogao ku di 220 ku Weimojie jingbian diwang xiang yanjiu [J]. Dunhuang yanjiu, 2018 nian di 06 qi, di 20–31 ye [Zhao, Yanlin (2018) ‘A study on the image of the Chinese emperor in the Vimalakirti Sutra illustration in Mogao Cave 220’, Dunhuang yanjiu = Dunhuang Research, (6), pp. 20–31]. (In Chinese).
- Yu Xiangdong. Dunhuang Weimojie jingbian yi kumen wei zhongxin de sheji yijiang — yi Mogao ku di 103 ku wei li [J]. Dunhuang xue jikan, 2010 nian di 03 qi, di 133–141 ye [Yu, Xiangdong (2010) ‘The design concept centered on the cave entrance in Dunhuang Vimalakirti transformation paintings: the case of Mogao Cave 103’, Dunhuang xue jikan = Journal of Dunhuang Studies, (3), pp. 133–141]. (In Chinese).
- Wu Jiatong. Dunhuang bihua zhong feitian wuzhe xingxiang yanbian tezheng yanjiu [D]. Changchun: Jilin yishu xueyuan, 2018 nian [Wu, Jiatong (2018) A study of the evolution of the image of the dancing feitian in Dunhuang murals. Master’s thesis, Jilin University of Arts, Changchun]. (In Chinese).
- Zhao Shengliang. Feitian yishu: cong Yindu dao Zhongguo [M]. Nanjing: Jiangsu meishu chubanshe, 2008. 191 ye [Zhao, Shengliang (2008) Feitian art: from India to China. Nanjing: Jiangsu Fine Arts Publishing House]. (In Chinese).
- Yue Jingjing. Dunhuang bihua feitian xingxiang yanjiu [D]. Lanzhou: Xibei shifan daxue, 2020 nian [Yue, Jingjing (2020) A study of feitian images in Dunhuang murals. Master’s thesis, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou]. (In Chinese).
- Wang, Weiqiao and Aibin, Yan (2023) ‘Body, scale, and space: study on the spatial construction of Mogao Cave 254’, Religions, 14(7), art. 953. doi:10.3390/rel14070953.
- Wu, Hung (2023) Spatial Dunhuang: experiencing the Mogao Caves. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
- Peng, Xueyang (2025) ‘Visualizing the spirit consciousness: reinterpreting the Medicine Buddha tableau in Mogao Cave 220 (642 CE)’, Religions, 16(10), art. 1225. doi:10.3390/rel16101225.
- He Shizhe. Dunhuang Mogao ku bihua zhong de “Weimojie jingbian” [J]. Dunhuang yanjiu, 1982 nian di 02 qi, di 62-87 ye [He, Shizhe (1982) ‘Images based on the Vimalakirti-nirdesha Sutra in Mogao murals’, Dunhuang yanjiu = Dunhuang Research, (2), pp. 62–87]. (In Chinese).
- Hamada, T. (2021) ‘Śākyamuni Buddha world depicted in Vimalakīrti scenes in Dunhuang Mogao Caves: The expansion of Buddha land to China’, Hualin International Journal of Buddhist Studies, 4(1), pp. 37–58. doi:10.15239/hijbs.04.01.02.
- Wei Yingchun. Dunhuang Mogao ku di 103 ku Weimojie xiang yu Wu Daozi huafeng [J]. Yishu baijia, 2016 nian 32 juan di 2 qi, di 214-217, 232 ye [Wei, Yingchun (2016) ‘The image of Vimalakirti in Mogao Cave 103 and the painting style of Wu Daozi’, Hundred Schools in Arts, 32(2), pp. 214–217, 232]. (In Chinese).
- Duan Wenjie. Luelun Dunhuang bihua de fengge tedian he yishu chengjiu [J]. Dunhuang yanjiu, 1982 nian di 02 qi, di 1-16 ye [Duan, Wenjie (1982) ‘On the stylistic features and artistic achievements of Dunhuang murals’, Dunhuang yanjiu = Dunhuang Research, (2), pp. 1–16]. (In Chinese).















